Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Your Nextdoor PCP's avatar

This is a fun read and a useful reminder that “membrane health” isn’t woo; phosphatidylcholine really is a major structural phospholipid in cell membranes and lipoproteins, and the liver’s PC supply is tightly tied to VLDL export, bile composition, and lipid handling. That makes the “PC as a liver-adjacent lever” biologically plausible, especially in metabolic dysfunction contexts. 

A couple clinician-scientist nuances that I think actually strengthen your thesis (without dulling the enthusiasm):

1. “Membrane repair” is a real concept, but it’s not magic detox. PC can support membrane composition/turnover and bile/lipoprotein pathways, but “pulling toxins off DNA” is the kind of wording that can outrun the evidence fast. Better frame: supporting hepatic phospholipid pools that influence lipid trafficking + inflammatory tone. 

2. The human evidence base is most coherent for liver-related endpoints (e.g., NAFLD/MASLD adjunct data); promising signals, but still not the kind of large, definitive RCT evidence people sometimes assume from supplement discourse. 

3. Practical guardrail worth mentioning for readers: PC is also a choline source, and people vary a lot in downstream metabolism (including TMA/TMAO pathways). That’s not a reason to fear it, but it is a reason to avoid “more is always better” dosing and to treat it as an N-of-1 with labs if someone is using it therapeutically. 

I like the core message “cells are built, not wished into health” and PC is a legitimate “building block” conversation. If you keep anchoring the claims to specific physiology (liver lipid export, bile, membrane composition) and avoid the detox superlatives, this becomes exactly the kind of biohacking content that’s empowering and scientifically defensible.

No posts

Ready for more?